The next complainant testified, not, you to definitely specific texts was indeed of an intimate characteristics
The new admissibility out of certain texts ranging from Hoggard and complainants try ruled into until the demonstration, however the material abruptly re also-came up because protection cross-checked-out next complainant.
The fresh Top got permission prior to trial to introduce some facts related to sms between Hoggard additionally the a couple complainants. Brand new Crown said the defence could be allowed to mix-check the fresh complainants on any facts prosecutors brought pertaining to the texts as opposed to and also make another software who if not be required for legal reasons, additionally the court concurred.
A few of the texts Hoggard traded with the more youthful complainant were shown to brand new judge, although Top did not inform you the messages he replaced into second complainant.
For example evidence cannot be regularly suggest an effective complainant are even more likely to concur or should not be believed — what is often called brand new « dual myths. »
Too, for the 2018, government entities altered the principles encompassing the utilization of individual facts connected with an excellent complainant however in brand new arms of your implicated — as well as texts, letters or photo — from inside the sexual assault products.
